Back to all templates
Freelance & agency project intake

Web project intake questionnaire — qualify the project before you quote it

A structured intake questionnaire that captures the four signals that predict project success — budget reality, timeline reality, content readiness, and decision-maker identity — before the discovery call, so the call starts at "how do we structure this" instead of "what's your budget."

Free — included in every plan

Web project intake questionnaire — qualify the project before you quote it

Live preview — try the fields below.

No fields to preview.

Who this template is for

The web-project intake questionnaire is the highest-leverage form in a freelance or agency stack. Most project failures — under-budget, under-timeline, content-blocked, decision-paralysis — trace back to bad intake, not bad execution. The freelancers and agencies that consistently deliver on time and on budget all share the same operational habit: they qualify the project before the discovery call, not during it. The questionnaire captures four signals that predict success or failure better than any other input. Budget reality: not the polite "competitive quote" range that prospects offer to anchor low, but the range they can actually fund — typically captured as 4-5 brackets that map to your service tiers, with the prospect selecting the bracket honestly because they've already self-qualified by reaching your intake form. Timeline reality: is the launch date driven by an external event you can't move (product launch, funding announcement, season opening, regulatory deadline) or is it aspirational ("as soon as possible")? External-driven deadlines change the project structure significantly because they invert who's pressuring whom. Content readiness: do you have the copy, the brand assets, the photography, the product data ready, or is that part of scope? Content-readiness is the single most-common cause of timeline slip in web projects, and capturing it upfront lets you scope accurately. Decision-maker identity: who signs the contract, who approves design, who provides content — these are often three different people, and the project structure has to accommodate the handoffs between them. This template gives you the structure to capture all four upfront, plus the field set that separates real projects from price-shoppers (who never sign contracts) and tire-kickers (who ask for proposals they never act on). Use it on your "work with me" page, in your link-in-bio, in your podcast-appearance bios, and in your outbound proposal-confirmation flow.

From inquiry to qualified discovery call in 48 hours

A prospect arrives via your portfolio site, your link-in-bio, a referral, a podcast appearance, or an outbound proposal-confirmation flow. They land on the intake questionnaire with clear framing: "I qualify projects upfront so we can spend the discovery call solving problems, not running through preliminaries." The form captures project type (new build / redesign / fix or rescue / migration / specific feature), industry and audience, budget range (4-5 brackets from your floor to your ceiling), timeline including any external-driven deadline, content readiness (have it / partial / need help producing), scope outline (which pages, which features, which integrations), brand-asset readiness (have brand / need brand work / brand work was someone else's job), decision-maker identity (you / your team / external approval needed), and the optional fields that separate real projects from research (have you worked with a freelancer/agency before? What was the outcome? What's the consequence if this project doesn't ship on time?). On submission, the questionnaire routes the inquiry to your CRM or project-pipeline tool — Notion, Airtable, HubSpot, Pipedrive, RD Station CRM for Brazilian freelancers, Pipefy for agencies running Brazilian-style workflows, ClickUp or Asana for the project-management transition once the deal closes. Qualified inquiries (budget in range, timeline workable, content situation manageable, decision-maker clear) route to your discovery-call calendar with priority routing. Unqualified inquiries (budget below your floor, timeline impossible, content situation requires scope you don't offer) get a same-day polite response with an alternative path — typically a referral to a smaller freelancer for sub-floor budgets, or a candid "this timeline isn't deliverable with the scope you've described" with a counter-proposal of either expanded timeline or reduced scope.

What's included

Each field below is here because experienced freelancers and agencies have learned that what prospects volunteer doesn't include the information you actually need to scope and deliver. The reality-check fields (budget, timeline, content, decision-maker) are the difference between projects that succeed and projects that become cautionary stories.

Built for the freelance and agency categories where project intake quality determines profitability

  • Freelance web designers and developers

    The primary use case. Solo freelancers and small teams (1-5 people) handling web design, frontend development, backend development, full-stack, or specialty work (Shopify, Webflow, WordPress, Next.js, Vercel deployments). Project sizes range from $1,500 micro-projects to $50,000+ enterprise engagements. The intake form is the single highest-leverage piece of operational infrastructure for this category because freelancers can't afford to take projects that don't make money — and projects that go bad usually fail because of intake-stage misalignment rather than execution-stage problems. For Brazilian freelancers (the Workana / 99Freelas / GetNinjas / Vagas.com freelancer-section market plus the LinkedIn-driven inbound from Brazilian SMB clients), the intake should accommodate Brazilian-specific considerations: payment in Pix or boleto, MEI vs. PJ status for invoicing, parcelamento expectations from clients. For Spanish freelancers (Workana, Malt, Yunick, Workana España), similar local-market considerations apply with Bizum/SEPA payment and autónomo invoicing.

  • Agency project intake (creative, dev, brand studios)

    Different scale and different decision dynamics than freelance. Agencies (10-100 people) handle projects from $25,000 to $500,000+ with more structured pricing tiers, more complex decision-maker structures (the client's marketing director might be your primary contact but the CFO signs the contract), and more sophisticated scoping work upfront. The intake form for agencies should accommodate multi-stakeholder decision-making (capture the client's primary contact, their decision-maker, their procurement contact, and their technical-stakeholder), longer timelines (agencies often work on 3-12 month engagements rather than freelance's 4-12 week cycles), and the procurement-process fields that enterprise clients need (PO numbers, vendor onboarding, security questionnaires). For Brazilian agencies (Globant LATAM, Mutato, NEON, AKQA Brasil, Suno United Creators, Wieden+Kennedy São Paulo, R/GA Brasil), the intake form is typically the first step in a longer sales cycle that involves multiple presentations and an RFP-style response. For Spanish agencies (Erretres, La Mosca, Acid House, Buena Onda, Hello Studio), similar multi-step sales cycles.

  • SaaS and digital product agencies

    A specialty category that handles product design and engineering for SaaS startups rather than marketing-style websites. Agencies in this category (ThirtyThree, Method, Range, Nuvalence, ueno for product work; for Brazilian SaaS-adjacent ZRP, Loft Labs, Quintoandar Labs internally) capture different intake signals than marketing agencies: existing product status (greenfield, MVP rebuild, mature product enhancement), tech stack preference (the client may have constraints — "we're on Vercel, we use Postgres, we have a React frontend"), team integration (will the agency work alongside the client's existing engineering team, or as a standalone build team), and the specific product-design vs. product-engineering split. The budget tiers are different too — SaaS product work commonly runs $50,000-500,000 per engagement with longer timelines than marketing-site work.

  • Brand and identity studios

    Different scope and different deliverable structure than web project intake but uses the same intake-form discipline. Brand studios (Pentagram, COLLINS, Mucho, &Walsh, Tomorrow Bureau, Multistandard; for Brazilian Crama Design, Estúdio Lampejo, RAM Design; for Spanish Mucho — also has Spanish presence, Pentagram London with Spanish work, Vasava, Toormix) capture project signals around brand strategy (rebrand vs. new brand vs. brand refresh vs. brand extension), deliverable scope (identity system, brand guidelines, visual language, voice and tone, naming, packaging, environmental, digital — these are typically priced as separate scope items), and the integration with adjacent disciplines (does the brand work feed into a web build, into packaging design, into environmental work). Budget tiers run higher than typical web work because brand strategy is harder to commodify — a logo design might be $2,500 but a full brand strategy with implementation can be $250,000-$1M+ for enterprise engagements.

  • E-commerce and Shopify development specialists

    A high-volume specialty where the intake questionnaire is especially important because the project parameters vary widely and the pricing is highly scope-dependent. Shopify specialists capture: current platform (migrating from WooCommerce, BigCommerce, Magento, Wix; new Shopify build; theme customization on existing Shopify), product catalog complexity (number of SKUs, variant complexity, inventory tracking needs), integration requirements (shipping providers, payment processors, ERP, accounting, marketing tools, review platforms), and the specific Shopify scope (theme customization, custom apps, Shopify Plus features, headless commerce with Hydrogen). For Brazilian Shopify specialists, the locale-specific integrations are typically the dominant scope: Pix payment integration via Mercado Pago, Pagar.me, or Iugu; boleto generation; NFSe automation via Sieg, NFE.io, eNotas; parcelamento setup; Reclame Aqui integration via webhook. For Spanish Shopify specialists, similar local-platform integrations (Bizum, Verifactu invoicing, Cookie compliance) dominate scope.

  • Conversion-optimization consultants and growth specialists

    A specialty where the intake questionnaire captures different signals: existing traffic volume and source (conversion optimization requires real traffic to test against, so 'we just launched' projects aren't a fit), existing conversion rate baseline, current analytics stack (Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel, Amplitude, PostHog, Heap), current testing tool (VWO, Optimizely, Convert, Statsig, PostHog Experiments), and the specific funnel stage to optimize (landing-page conversion, signup-to-activation, trial-to-paid, free-to-paid). The deliverable structure differs from web design: conversion-optimization engagements are typically structured as test-budgets (run X tests over Y months for $Z) or as performance-based (revenue share on uplift, increasingly common in 2024-2026). For Brazilian and Spanish-speaking growth specialists, the locale-specific platform expertise matters (Brazilian fintech conversion patterns, parcelamento abandonment patterns, Pix conversion patterns).

Tune the intake questionnaire to your service tier and your project mix

Start with the budget brackets. Define 4-5 brackets that map to your actual service tiers — typically a starter tier (smallest projects you'll accept), a standard tier (your bread-and-butter project size), a premium tier (your larger engagements), an enterprise tier (your largest), and an above-floor catch-all for clients who don't fit the brackets. The prospect selects honestly because they've already self-qualified by reaching your intake form, and the bracket determines which sales workflow runs (small projects can flow to a same-day quote; large engagements route to a multi-call sales process). Add timeline reality-check fields — capture both the prospect's stated timeline and the question "is this timeline driven by an external event we can't move?" The latter changes the project structure significantly. Add content-readiness assessment — "do you have the copy / brand / photography / product data ready, or is that part of scope?" Content-readiness misalignment is the single most-common cause of timeline slip, and surfacing it upfront lets you scope content production as a separate deliverable when needed. Add decision-maker identification — "who signs the contract, who approves design, who provides content?" These are often three different people, and the project structure has to accommodate the handoffs. For freelancers, the intake should also vet for project-fit-with-your-style — the design freelancer who specializes in minimal e-commerce shouldn't take on maximalist brand-heavy projects, and the intake should ask enough about brand aesthetics to surface the mismatch before the discovery call. For agencies, the intake should accommodate procurement-process fields that enterprise clients need. For Brazilian freelancers and agencies, integrate with Pix for deposit collection (instant deposit confirms the project is real) and surface the parcelamento payment expectation that Brazilian clients often have. For Spanish, surface Bizum and SEPA Direct Debit payment paths. Translate the intake into the languages of your client base — bilingual freelancers in cross-border markets specifically benefit from native-language intake forms.

Web project intake questionnaire FAQ

A generic contact form captures interest. A web-project intake questionnaire qualifies a project before the discovery call. The structural difference: the intake form captures budget brackets, timeline reality, content readiness, decision-maker identity, and scope specifics in 5-10 minutes of structured questions — turning what would otherwise be the entire first discovery call into pre-call work. This lets the discovery call start at "how do we structure this" rather than "what's your budget," which is the right starting point because the budget conversation is the most uncomfortable part of any project intake and getting it out of the way via form (where prospects answer more honestly than they do verbally) saves both sides time. A generic contact form gets 80% of inquiries from price-shoppers and tire-kickers; an intake questionnaire filters these out because they don't bother completing the qualifying questions. The 20% who do complete are dramatically more likely to become real projects.
The intake questionnaire approach is: share budget brackets (not specific rates), and quote per-project once the intake reveals scope. Sharing budget brackets ("projects typically run $X-Y for our starter tier, $Y-Z for standard, $Z-W for premium") pre-qualifies prospects by their budget reality, lets them self-select into the right bracket, and signals that you're a real business with structured pricing rather than a freelancer who'll quote whatever the market will bear. Quoting specific rates without scope is impossible (a 3-page brochure site is fundamentally different work from a 50-page e-commerce build, even though both might be called "a website"), so the actual quote happens after the intake captures the scope. The brackets-plus-scoped-quote pattern is the standard for established freelancers above the $5,000 project floor and for all agencies. Below the $5,000 floor, fixed-package pricing on the intake form sometimes works as a self-serve option for the smallest project tier.
Three patterns, in order of structural soundness. First and most important: capture explicit scope on the intake form itself, with the prospect listing the pages, features, integrations, and content they want — not as a wishlist but as a contract specification. Scope-by-form is dramatically more enforceable than scope-by-conversation. Second: structure the proposal and contract with explicit out-of-scope language alongside the in-scope language. "This project includes X, Y, Z. The following are not included and would require separate scope: A, B, C." Spelling out what's not included is as important as what is. Third: use a change-order process for in-flight scope additions — when the client asks for something not in the original scope, surface the change-order option (with the additional cost and timeline impact) rather than just absorbing the new work. The change-order discipline is the single biggest predictor of profitable freelance and agency work, and most freelancers and small agencies under-invest in it because it feels confrontational. It's not — it's just professional. Clients who can't accept change orders for out-of-scope work are clients whose original budget was wrong and whose project would have run over anyway.
Yes — the intake form's webhook can fire to your project-management tool to create a project record once the engagement is confirmed. Notion is the dominant tool for solo freelancers and small agencies, with the intake creating a project page in the appropriate database with all the captured fields. Airtable serves a similar role with stronger relational-data capabilities. Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Monday handle larger agency project-management with formal task structures. For Brazilian agencies and freelancers, Pipefy is the dominant local project-management tool with strong workflow automation — the intake form fires to Pipefy to create a card in the project pipeline. The CRM-side integration (capturing the inquiry as a sales-pipeline lead before it becomes a project) typically routes to HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close, Notion CRM, RD Station CRM for Brazilian B2B, with the project record created downstream once the deal closes. For deposit collection (which confirms the project is real before scoping work begins), integrate with Stripe, Mercado Pago, Pagar.me, Iugu for Brazilian, Bizum for Spanish — instant deposit collection from the intake form eliminates the 'is this prospect real' question and dramatically improves the close rate of intake forms that include the deposit option.
Four vet-for-fit questions to add to the intake. First, the project-type fit: does the prospect's project match your specialty? A freelancer who specializes in Shopify e-commerce shouldn't take on WordPress-membership-site projects, and the intake should ask enough about platform and scope to surface mismatches before the discovery call. Second, the client-relationship fit: have they worked with a freelancer or agency before, and what was the outcome? Prospects who have never worked with external designers/developers and prospects whose previous engagements ended badly are both higher-risk than prospects with a track record of successful external engagements. Third, the timeline-pressure fit: is the launch date driven by an external event that can't move, and is that event realistic given the scope they've described? Unrealistic external-driven timelines are project-failure setups. Fourth, the values-fit: does the prospect's industry and product fit with your professional values? Most established freelancers and agencies decline 20-40% of inquiries on values-fit grounds (no gambling, no MLM, no industries the freelancer doesn't want to work with), and the intake form is where this filter applies most efficiently. Polite decline at the intake stage with a referral when possible preserves the relationship for future cycles and builds referral goodwill.

Related templates

Free Personality Quiz Template

An email-gated personality quiz that segments respondents by archetype, captures every taker in your CRM, and powers tailored follow-up sequences.

View template

Free Freelance Quote Form Template

A structured project intake form so freelancers get a real quote out on the first reply — not the third email. Captures budget, timeline, scope, and files.

View template

Digital product checkout — sell ebooks, templates, presets, and downloads in one form

Online checkout form template for digital products — ebooks, templates, presets, samples, license keys, downloadable assets.

View template

Ready to build forms that work for you?

Create your first form in minutes. Your submissions will thank you.

Be first in lineLimited early accessSet up in 2 minutes